Hypothetical and Real Consequences in Experimental Auctions for Insurance against Low Probability Risks
Behavioral Decision Making, Vol. 5, 107-116, 1992
11 Pages Posted: 13 May 2009
Date Written: July 25, 1992
Abstract
Laboratory experiments have provided useful information about how people behave in risky siluations. In particular, such experiments have allowed for the observation of many deviations from the predictions of expected utility theory. There is some dispute, however, over the effect ofthe use of real versus hypothetical money in these experiments and over the Impact of experience. In this paper we describe auction experiments in which subjects faced a low-probability risk with either hypothetical or real-money consequences and varying amounts of experience. Using hypothetical payoffs resulted in behavior that provides a reasonable qualitative prediction of behavior with real consequences, but that seems to indicate a less diligent attitude toward spending the money as well as less concern about the risk.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
By Christopher K. Hsee, George Loewenstein, ...
-
Preference Reversals and the Measurement of Environmental Values
By Julie R. Irwin, Paul Slovic, ...
-
Music, Pandas, and Muggers: On the Affective Psychology of Value
-
Elastic Justification: How Tempting But Task-Irrelevant Factors Influence Decisions
-
Elastic Justification: How Unjustifiable Factors Influence Judgments
-
Lay Rationalism and Inconsistency between Predicted Experience and Decision
By Christopher K. Hsee, Frank Yu, ...
-
A Meta-Analysis of Hypothetical Bias in Stated Preference Valuation
By James J. Murphy, P. Geoffrey Allen, ...
-
Distinction Bias: Misprediction and Mischoice Due to Joint Evaluation
By Christopher K. Hsee and Jiao Zhang
-
Less is Better: When Low-Value Options are Valued More Highly than High-Value Options