Council Regulation (EC) 44/2001 and Internet Consumer Contracts: Some Thoughts on Article 15 and the Futility of Applying 'In the Box' Conflict of Law Rules to the 'Out of the Box' Borderless World

Posted: 7 Mar 2009 Last revised: 8 May 2009

See all articles by Charles Wild

Charles Wild

University of Hertfordshire

Stuart Weinstein

Aston University - Aston Business School

Christine Riefa

Brunel University - Brunel Law School

Date Written: 2005

Abstract

The Internet is by definition a borderless medium. Reflecting on the Council Regulation (EC) 44/2001 and Internet Consumer Contracts, this article develops some thoughts on the futility of applying some traditional conflict of law rules to the borderless world. It focuses on a few aspects attempting to establish when thinking 'out of the box' may be of benefit to consumers and their protection under article 15.

Keywords: jurisdiction, Internet, consumers, consumer contracts, Brussels Regulation

Suggested Citation

Wild, Charles and Weinstein, Stuart and Riefa, Christine, Council Regulation (EC) 44/2001 and Internet Consumer Contracts: Some Thoughts on Article 15 and the Futility of Applying 'In the Box' Conflict of Law Rules to the 'Out of the Box' Borderless World (2005). International Review of Law, Computers & Technology, Vol. 19, No. 1, 2005, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1352543

Charles Wild

University of Hertfordshire ( email )

Hertford Herts, SG13 8QF
United Kingdom

Stuart Weinstein

Aston University - Aston Business School ( email )

Aston Triangle
Birmingham, B47ET
United Kingdom

Christine Riefa (Contact Author)

Brunel University - Brunel Law School ( email )

Kingston Lane
Elliott Jaques Building
Uxbridge, Middlesex UB8 3PH
United Kingdom

HOME PAGE: http://www.brunel.ac.uk/people/christine-riefa

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
716
PlumX Metrics