Consensual Decision-Making among Epistemic Peers
21 Pages Posted: 5 Mar 2009
Date Written: March 5, 2009
Abstract
This paper focuses on the question of how to resolve disagreement, and uses the Lehrer-Wagner model as a formal tool for investigating consensual decision-making. The main result consists in a general definition of when agents treat each other as epistemic peers (Kelly 2005; Elga 2007), and a theorem vindicating the "equal weight view" to resolve disagreement among epistemic peers. We apply our findings to an analysis of the impact of social network structures on group deliberation processes, and we demonstrate their stability with the help of numerical simulations.
Keywords: Disagreement, consensus, epistemic peers, social networks
JEL Classification: D71
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Persuasion Bias, Social Influence, and Uni-Dimensional Opinions
By Peter M. Demarzo, Jeffrey Zwiebel, ...
-
Naive Learning in Social Networks: Convergence, Influence and Wisdom of Crowds
By Matthew O. Jackson and Benjamin Golub
-
Bayesian Learning in Social Networks
By Daron Acemoglu, Munther Dahleh, ...
-
Bayesian Learning in Social Networks
By Ilan Lobel, Munther Dahleh, ...
-
Opinion Dynamics and Learning in Social Networks
By Daron Acemoglu and Asuman E. Ozdaglar
-
Rational Social Learning by Random Sampling
By Lones Smith and Peter Norman Sorensen
-
Information Percolation in Segmented Markets
By Darrell Duffie, Gustavo Manso, ...
-
Information Percolation in Segmented Markets
By Darrell Duffie, Semyon Malamud, ...
-
How Homophily Affects the Speed of Learning and Best Response Dynamics
By Benjamin Golub and Matthew O. Jackson
-
Spread of (Mis)Information in Social Networks
By Daron Acemoglu, Asuman E. Ozdaglar, ...