Selectivity, Market Timing and the Morningstar Star-Rating System
CESifo Working Paper Series No. 2580
DIW Berlin Discussion Paper No. 874
27 Pages Posted: 16 Mar 2009
Date Written: April 1, 2009
Abstract
This paper evaluates the Morningstar mutual fund ranking system. We find that indeed higher Morningstar ratings are associated with higher returns on the portfolios including respectively five-, four-, three-, two- and one-star funds only (STAR5 to STAR1). We then perform an unconditional and conditional portfolio performance evaluation. In both cases the evidence suggests that the better performance of the STAR3, STAR4 and STAR5 categories reflects superior stock selection rather than market timing abilities. Overall, the implication for the Morningstar ranking system is that this is most effective in identifying the worst-performing funds (STAR1 or STAR2) rather than the best-performing ones.
Keywords: mutual fund, Morningstar Star-Rating System, CAPM, conditional and unconditional portfolio performance evaluation
JEL Classification: G23
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Risk Taking by Mutual Funds as a Response to Incentives
By Judith A. Chevalier and Glenn Ellison
-
Mutual Fund Flows and Performance in Rational Markets
By Richard C. Green and Jonathan Berk
-
Mutual Fund Flows and Performance in Rational Markets
By Richard C. Green and Jonathan Berk
-
Career Concerns of Mutual Fund Managers
By Judith A. Chevalier and Glenn Ellison
-
Career Concerns of Mutual Fund Managers
By Judith A. Chevalier and Glenn Ellison
-
The Persistence of Risk-Adjusted Mutual Fund Performance
By Edwin J. Elton, Martin J. Gruber, ...
-
By Judith A. Chevalier and Glenn Ellison
-
Hot Hands in Mutual Funds: the Persistence of Performance, 1974-87
By Darryll Hendricks, Jayendu Patel, ...
-
By Narasimhan Jegadeesh, Hsiu-lang Chen, ...