The Persistent Effects of a False News Shock
31 Pages Posted: 17 Nov 2011 Last revised: 22 Jul 2019
There are 3 versions of this paper
The Persistent Effects of a False News Shock
The Persistent Effects of a False News Shock
The Persistent Effects of a False News Shock
Date Written: June 1, 2011
Abstract
In September 2008, a six-year-old article about the 2002 bankruptcy of United Airlines' parent company resurfaced on the Internet and was mistakenly believed to be reporting a new bankruptcy filing by the company. This episode caused the company's stock price to drop by as much as 76 percent in just a few minutes, before NASDAQ halted trading. After the "news" had been identified as false, the stock price rebounded, but still ended the day 11.2 percent below the previous close. We explore this natural experiment by using a simple asset-pricing model to study the aftermath of this false news shock. We find that, after three trading sessions, the company's stock was still trading below the two-standard-deviation band implied by the model and that it returned to within one standard deviation only during the sixth trading session. On the seventh day after the episode, the stock was trading at the level predicted by the asset-pricing model. We investigate several potential explanations for this finding, but fail to find empirical evidence supporting any of them. We also document that the false news shock had a persistent negative effect on the stock prices of other major airline companies. This is consistent with the view that contagion effects would have dominated competitive effects had the bankruptcy actually taken place.
Keywords: fake news, false news, natural experiment, United Airlines, noise, market efficiency, contagion
JEL Classification: G10, G14
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Giving Content to Investor Sentiment: The Role of Media in the Stock Market
-
More than Words: Quantifying Language to Measure Firms' Fundamentals
By Paul C. Tetlock, Maytal Saar-tsechansky, ...
-
Is All that Talk Just Noise? The Information Content of Internet Stock Message Boards
By Murray Z. Frank and Werner Antweiler
-
Media Coverage and the Cross-Section of Stock Returns
By Lily H. Fang and Joel Peress
-
When is a Liability not a Liability? Textual Analysis, Dictionaries, and 10-Ks
By Tim Loughran and Bill Mcdonald
-
Do Stock Market Investors Understand the Risk Sentiment of Corporate Annual Reports?
By Feng Li
-
Yahoo! For Amazon: Sentiment Parsing from Small Talk on the Web
By Sanjiv Ranjan Das and Mike Y. Chen
-
By Zhi Da, Joseph Engelberg, ...
-
By Joshua D. Coval and Tyler Shumway
-
The Impact of Credibility on the Pricing of Managerial Textual Content
By Elizabeth Demers and Clara Vega