Corporate Misgovernance at the World Bank
51 Pages Posted: 30 Mar 2009
Date Written: March 23, 2009
Abstract
We test for evidence of corporate misgovernance at the World Bank. Most major decisions at the World Bank are made by its Board of Executive Directors. However, in any given year the majority of the Bank's member countries do not get a chance to serve on this powerful body. In this paper, we empirically investigate whether board membership leads to higher funding from the World Bank's two main development financing institutions, the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD) and the International Development Association (IDA). We find that developing countries serving on the Board of Executive Directors can expect an approximate doubling of funding from the IBRD. In absolute terms, countries serving on the board are rewarded with an average $60 million "bonus" in IBRD loans. This is more likely driven by soft forces like boardroom culture rather than by the power of the vote itself. We find no significant effect in IDA funding.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
By A. Craig Burnside and David Dollar
-
Aid, Policies, and Growth: Revisiting the Evidence
By A. Craig Burnside and David Dollar
-
Who Gives Foreign Aid to Whom and Why?
By Alberto F. Alesina and David Dollar
-
Aid Allocation and Poverty Reduction
By David Dollar and Paul Collier
-
Aid and Growth: What Does the Cross-Country Evidence Really Show?
-
Aid and Growth: What Does the Cross-Country Evidence Really Show?
-
New Data, New Doubts: Revisiting 'Aid, Policies, and Growth'
By William Easterly, Ross Levine, ...
-
New Data, New Doubts: A Comment on Burnside and Dollar's "Aid, Policies, and Growth" (2000)
By William Easterly, Ross Levine, ...