The Cohabitation Rule: Indeterminacy and Oppression in Australian Social Security Law

42 Pages Posted: 22 Apr 2009

See all articles by Kieran Mark Tranter

Kieran Mark Tranter

Griffith University - Griffith Law School

Abstract

This article argues that the cohabitation rule in Australian social security law is uncertain and has, as a consequence, given rise to an oppressive administrative regime. It tracks the indeterminate nature of the rule as a constant feature throughout its history and argues that this imprecision remains within its current formulation in the Social Security Act 1991 (Cth). Drawing upon basic ideas about the functionality of rules, it is suggested that the administration of an undefined rule should be attended by resistance and challenge. However, the social security regime and the cohabitation rule appear to have been accepted by the community. This acceptance is explained as being the result of the oppressiveness of the current administration. Drawing upon analysis of Administrative Appeals Tribunal decisions and interviews conducted with Centrelink clients, this article argues that the cohabitation rule unfairly targets vulnerable clients, is implemented through the use of invasive surveillance and provides opportunities for intimidation by Centrelink officers.

Keywords: Cohabitation social security act Australia rules functionality Centrelink invasive intimidation

Suggested Citation

Tranter, Kieran Mark, The Cohabitation Rule: Indeterminacy and Oppression in Australian Social Security Law. Melbourne University Law Review, Vol. 32, 2009, Griffith Socio-Legal Research Centre, Research Paper No. 09-7, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1391754

Kieran Mark Tranter (Contact Author)

Griffith University - Griffith Law School ( email )

Nathan Campus, GU
Nathan 4111
Australia

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
79
Abstract Views
830
Rank
555,299
PlumX Metrics