The Real Exchange Rate in Sticky Price Models: Does Investment Matter?
44 Pages Posted: 4 May 2009
Date Written: July 1, 2008
Abstract
This paper re-examines the ability of sticky-price models to generate volatile and persistent real exchange rates. We use a DSGE framework with pricing-to-market akin to those in Chari, et al. (2002) and Steinsson (2008) to illustrate the link between real exchange rate dynamics and what the model assumes about physical capital. We show that adding capital accumulation to the model facilitates consumption smoothing and significantly impedes the model’s ability to generate volatile real exchange rates. Our analysis, therefore, caveats the results in Steinsson (2008) who shows how real shocks in a sticky-price model without capital can replicate the observed real exchange rate dynamics. Finally, we find that the CKM (2002) persistence anomaly remains robust to several alternative capital specifications including set-ups with variable capital utilization and investment adjustment costs (see, e.g., Christiano, et al., 2005). In summary, the PPP puzzle is still very much alive and well.
Keywords: Real Exchange Rate, PPP puzzle, Monetary Policy
JEL Classification: F31, F37, F41
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
International Risk-Sharing and the Transmission of Productivity Shocks
By Giancarlo Corsetti, Luca Dedola, ...
-
International Risk Sharing and the Transmission of Productivity Shocks
By Giancarlo Corsetti, Luca Dedola, ...
-
Consumption and Real Exchange Rates with Incomplete Markets and Non-Traded Goods
-
Consumption and Real Exchange Rates With Incomplete Markets and Non-Traded Goods
-
International Trade in Durable Goods: Understanding Volatility, Cyclicality, and Elasticities
By Charles M. Engel and Jian Wang
-
Technology Shocks: Novel Implications for International Business Cycles
By Andrea Raffo