Is the EITC Equivalent to an Nit? Conditional Cash Transfers and Tax Incidence
43 Pages Posted: 19 May 2009 Last revised: 24 Nov 2022
Date Written: May 2009
Abstract
The Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) is intended to encourage work. But EITC-induced increases in labor supply may drive wages down, shifting the intended transfer toward employers. I simulate the economic incidence of the EITC under a range of plausible supply and demand elasticities. In all of the scenarios that I consider, a substantial portion of the intended transfer to low income single mothers is captured by employers through reduced wages. The transfer to employers is borne in part by low skill workers who are not themselves eligible for the EITC and are therefore made strictly worse off by its existence. I contrast the EITC with a traditional Negative Income Tax (NIT). The NIT discourages work, and so induces large transfers from employers of low skill labor to their workers. With my preferred parameters the EITC increases after-tax incomes by $0.73 per dollar spent, while the NIT yields $1.39.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Labor Supply Response to the Earned Income Tax Credit
By Nada Eissa and Jeffrey B. Liebman
-
Welfare, the Earned Income Tax Credit, and the Labor Supply of Single Mothers
By Bruce D. Meyer and Dan T. Rosenbaum
-
By V. Joseph Hotz and John Karl Scholz
-
The Earned Income Tax Credit and the Labor Supply of Married Couples
-
Financial Incentives for Increasing Work and Income Among Low-Income Families
By Rebecca M. Blank, David Card, ...
-
Making Single Mothers Work: Recent Tax and Welfare Policy and its Effects
By Bruce D. Meyer and Dan T. Rosenbaum