Accounting Restatements and the Timeliness of Disclosures

Posted: 25 May 2009 Last revised: 10 Jan 2012

See all articles by Brad A. Badertscher

Brad A. Badertscher

University of Notre Dame

Jeffrey J. Burks

University of Notre Dame

Date Written: January 8, 2010

Abstract

Regulators are concerned that during the process of restating financial statements firms fail to provide timely progress updates, and delay earnings announcements and regulatory filings. To reduce these perceived lags in disclosure, an advisory group to the Securities and Exchange Commission recommends more use of catch-up adjustments rather than restatements to correct accounting errors. Some investor groups oppose the recommendations because they fear that preparers will begin to correct important errors through catch-up adjustments, which are less transparent than restatements.

We inform this debate by examining 1) the length of disclosure lags around restatements to understand the extent of the problem, and 2) the causes of disclosure lags to evaluate whether the reforms would address the root causes of the lags. We find that lengthy lags are uncommon and appear to be largely unavoidable consequences of fraud investigations. When fraud is a factor, the firm typically takes weeks or months to release restatement details, quarterly earnings, and SEC filings, likely because investigations are necessary to restore the firm’s ability to produce reliable information. When fraud is not a factor, the firm typically discloses the restatement’s earnings impact within a day of the initial restatement announcement, and delays the quarterly earnings announcement and SEC filing by less than a week. Although fraud is by far the most economically significant cause of lags, we also find that lags increase when a restatement involves multiple, longstanding, or large errors. Finally, we show that the restatements targeted by the reforms tend to have the shortest lags, even among non-fraudulent restatements. Thus, the proposed reforms would have a negligible effect on disclosure timeliness because the targeted restatements tend to have short lags to begin with, and because long lags appear to be caused by inherent constraints on producing reliable information.

Keywords: accounting restatements, disclosure lags, stock liquidity, return volatility, delistings, debt covenants

JEL Classification: M41, G38

Suggested Citation

Badertscher, Brad A. and Burks, Jeffrey J., Accounting Restatements and the Timeliness of Disclosures (January 8, 2010). Accounting Horizons, Vol. 25, No. 4, December 2011, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1407233

Brad A. Badertscher

University of Notre Dame ( email )

Mendoza College of Business
Notre Dame, IN 46556-5646
United States

Jeffrey J. Burks (Contact Author)

University of Notre Dame ( email )

Mendoza College of Business
Notre Dame, IN 46556-5646
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
4,073
PlumX Metrics