The Death Penalty and Gender Discrimination

Law & Society Review, Vol. 25, p. 367, 1991

18 Pages Posted: 29 May 2009

See all articles by Elizabeth Rapaport

Elizabeth Rapaport

University of New Mexico - School of Law

Date Written: 1991

Abstract

Despite the paucity of research on the death penalty and gender discrimination, it is widely supposed that women murderers are chivalrously spared the death sentence. This supposition is fueled by the relatively small number of women who are condemned. This article argues that women are represented on contemporary U.S. death rows in numbers commensurate with the infrequency of female commission of those crimes which our society labels sufficiently reprehensible to merit capital punishment. Additionally, preliminary investigation suggests that death-sentenced women are more likely than death-sentenced men to have killed intimates, although the explanation for this disparity is not yet at hand. It is further argued, on the basis of a content analysis of state capital statutes, that there is a form of gender bias inimical to the interests of women in our capital punishment law: The death penalty is a dramatic symbol of the imputation of greater seriousness to economic and other predatory murder as compared with domestic murder.

Suggested Citation

Rapaport, Elizabeth, The Death Penalty and Gender Discrimination (1991). Law & Society Review, Vol. 25, p. 367, 1991, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1411240

Elizabeth Rapaport (Contact Author)

University of New Mexico - School of Law ( email )

1117 Stanford Drive, N.E.
MSC11 6070
Albuquerque, NM 87131-0001
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
547
Abstract Views
3,041
Rank
93,928
PlumX Metrics