On the Political Economy of Banking and Financial Regulatory Reform in Emerging Markets

Research in Financial Services

Posted: 21 Dec 1998

See all articles by Randall Kroszner

Randall Kroszner

University of Chicago - Booth School of Business; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)

Multiple version iconThere are 2 versions of this paper

Abstract

This paper synthesizes literature on the economics of regulation and positive political economy to provide a framework for understanding why certain types of banking and financial regulations arise in particular circumstance and what causes them to change. The analysis focuses on competition among rival interest groups. Technological and economic shocks alter the value of regulation to existing interest groups and their lobbying power, and these shocks recently have been tending to tip the balance in favor of the deregulation. The structure of the public decision-making process plays a role by affecting the willingness of different groups to organize and the influence of those groups as lobbyists. The fiscal demands of the government play an important role. Academics also may play a role by generating ideas and arguments that can increase or decrease the effectiveness of an interest group's lobbying effort. The positive analysis of how regulatory change evolves may ultimately provide normative guidance for those who wish to implement lasting policy reforms in both emerging and developed economies.

Note: This is a description of the paper and is not the actual abstract.

Suggested Citation

Kroszner, Randall, On the Political Economy of Banking and Financial Regulatory Reform in Emerging Markets. Research in Financial Services, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=141309

Randall Kroszner (Contact Author)

University of Chicago - Booth School of Business ( email )

5807 S. Woodlawn Avenue
Chicago, IL 60637
United States
773-702-8779 (Phone)

National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)

1050 Massachusetts Avenue
Cambridge, MA 02138
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
965
PlumX Metrics