The Light Treatment of a Complex Problem: The Law of Self-Defence in the Israeli Wall Case
19 Pages Posted: 6 Jun 2009
Date Written: June 3, 2009
Abstract
In its recent Israeli Wall opinion, the International Court of Justice gave rather short shrift to Israel’s claims that the construction of the wall could be justified as an act of self-defence in the sense of Art. 51 UNC. This comment assesses the Court’s approach and places it in the broader context of ICJ pronouncements on the use of force. It suggests that the Court failed to appreciate the complex legal problems to which Israel’s claim gave rise, in particular the problem of self-defence against attacks by non-State actors. It shows that the Court’s restrictive understanding of self-defence, while following the 1986 merits judgment in the Nicaragua case, is difficult to bring in line with modern State practice, and increases the pressure to admit other, non-written, exceptions to Art. 2(4) UNC.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
The Ilc Articles on State Responsibility: The Paradoxical Relationship between Form and Authority
-
State Responsibility for the Acts of Private Armed Groups
By Derek Jinks
-
Looking Up, Down and Across: The Icty's Place in the International Legal Order
By Mark Drumbl