Sabotage in Tournaments: Evidence from a Laboratory Experiment
31 Pages Posted: 14 Jun 2009
Abstract
Although relative performance schemes are pervasive in organizations reliable empirical data on induced sabotage behavior is almost non-existent. We study sabotage in tournaments in a controlled laboratory experiment and are able to confirm one of the key insights from theory: effort and sabotage increase with the wage spread. Additionally, we find that even in the presence of tournament incentives, agents react reciprocally to higher wages, which mitigates the sabotage problem. Destructive activities are reduced by explicitly calling them by their name 'sabotage'. Communication among principal and agents curbs sabotage due to agreements on flat prize structures and increased output.
Keywords: sabotage, tournament, reciprocity, relative performance scheme, experiment
JEL Classification: M52, J33, J41, L23, C72, C91
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
By Charles Bellemare, Sabine Kröger, ...
-
The Development of Egalitarianism, Altruism, Spite and Parochialism in Childhood and Adolescence
By Ernst Fehr, Daniela Glätzle-rützler, ...
-
The Development of Egalitarianism, Altruism, Spite and Parochialism in Childhood and Adolescence
By Ernst Fehr, Daniela Glätzle-rützler, ...
-
When is Employee Retaliation Acceptable at Work? Evidence from Quasi- Experiments
By Gary Charness and David I. Levine
-
An Experimental Analysis of Needs in Ultimatum Bargaining
By J. Dgdg and Hulda Thorisdottir
-
Social Responsibility of the Auditor as Independent Gatekeeper: An Experimental Investigation
By Amy K. Choy, Thomas Fields, ...