Judical Deliberations in the European Court of Human Rights

THE LIGITIMACY OF HIGHEST COURT'S RULINGS, N. Huls, M. Adamds & J. Bomhof, eds., pp. 407-436, The Hague: T. M. C. Asser Press, 2008

30 Pages Posted: 17 Jul 2009 Last revised: 12 Nov 2009

See all articles by Janneke Gerards

Janneke Gerards

Utrecht University - Faculty of Law; Institute for Jurisprudence, Constitutional and Administrative Law

Date Written: 2008

Abstract

This part of the book attempts to further explore the hypothesis that the legitimacy of a court can be explained by the extent to which it is able to respond to its problematic, by taking the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) as a case study.

Keywords: Judicial Deliberation, European Court of Human Rights, Judicial Legitimacy

Suggested Citation

Gerards, Janneke, Judical Deliberations in the European Court of Human Rights (2008). THE LIGITIMACY OF HIGHEST COURT'S RULINGS, N. Huls, M. Adamds & J. Bomhof, eds., pp. 407-436, The Hague: T. M. C. Asser Press, 2008, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1435258

Janneke Gerards (Contact Author)

Utrecht University - Faculty of Law ( email )

Achter Sint Pieter 200
Utrecht, 3512 HT
Netherlands

Institute for Jurisprudence, Constitutional and Administrative Law ( email )

Achter Sint Pieter 200
Utrecht, 3512 HT
Netherlands

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
149
Abstract Views
671
Rank
354,722
PlumX Metrics