Judical Deliberations in the European Court of Human Rights
THE LIGITIMACY OF HIGHEST COURT'S RULINGS, N. Huls, M. Adamds & J. Bomhof, eds., pp. 407-436, The Hague: T. M. C. Asser Press, 2008
30 Pages Posted: 17 Jul 2009 Last revised: 12 Nov 2009
Date Written: 2008
Abstract
This part of the book attempts to further explore the hypothesis that the legitimacy of a court can be explained by the extent to which it is able to respond to its problematic, by taking the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) as a case study.
Keywords: Judicial Deliberation, European Court of Human Rights, Judicial Legitimacy
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Gerards, Janneke, Judical Deliberations in the European Court of Human Rights (2008). THE LIGITIMACY OF HIGHEST COURT'S RULINGS, N. Huls, M. Adamds & J. Bomhof, eds., pp. 407-436, The Hague: T. M. C. Asser Press, 2008, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1435258
Feedback
Feedback to SSRN
If you need immediate assistance, call 877-SSRNHelp (877 777 6435) in the United States, or +1 212 448 2500 outside of the United States, 8:30AM to 6:00PM U.S. Eastern, Monday - Friday.