We Won't Vote for You If You Haven't Already Won: A (Losing) Candidate's Perspective on the Prospects for Meaningful Reform of the American Electoral System

29 Pages Posted: 6 Aug 2009

See all articles by Michael A. Livingston

Michael A. Livingston

Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey - Rutgers Law School

Date Written: August 6, 2009

Abstract

This essay considers the status of the American electoral system from the perspective of a law professor who was also a notoriously unsuccessful congressional candidate. The essay suggests that a combination of financing inequities, gerrymandered districts, and the general lack of substance in legislative elections have combined to make our existing electoral system all but dysfunctional; moreover, that many or most of the proposed remedies are based on a naive understanding of the process and would actually make things worse. Expanding upon the work of Lani Guinier and political scientist Douglas Amy, the author suggests that some type of proportional representation system is likely necessary to improve our system and restore substance and fairness to our politics.

Keywords: election law, campaign finance, minority districting

JEL Classification: H11, K00, K19

Suggested Citation

Livingston, Michael A., We Won't Vote for You If You Haven't Already Won: A (Losing) Candidate's Perspective on the Prospects for Meaningful Reform of the American Electoral System (August 6, 2009). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1444854 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1444854

Michael A. Livingston (Contact Author)

Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey - Rutgers Law School ( email )

Newark, NJ
United States
856-225-6368 (Phone)
856-225-6516 (Fax)

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
56
Abstract Views
631
Rank
670,101
PlumX Metrics