Whistleblowing Attorneys and Ethical Infrastructures

63 Pages Posted: 11 Aug 2009 Last revised: 15 Sep 2009

See all articles by Alex B. Long

Alex B. Long

University of Tennessee College of Law

Date Written: August 11, 2009

Abstract

Rule 5.1 of the ABA’s Model Rules of Professional Conduct requires law firm partners to make reasonable efforts to supervise subordinate attorneys and to ensure that the firm has internal measures in place that give 'reasonable assurance' that all lawyers within the firm are complying with their ethical obligations. Despite the existence of this ethical duty, there are enough judicial decisions involving attorneys who have been fired for blowing the whistle on unethical conduct to lead one to suspect that perhaps law firm compliance measures regarding Rule 5.1 leave something to be desired. This Article discusses the role that a law firm’s ethical infrastructure - or lack thereof - may have on encouraging junior attorneys to make internal and external reports of suspected unethical conduct. It describes the results of a survey concerning law firm compliance measures and offers several proposals to encourage attorneys to make internal reports of suspected unethical conduct and to protect those attorneys who make internal and external reports of suspected unethical conduct.

Keywords: Retaliation, Whistleblowers, Whistleblowing, Model Rules, Legal Ethics, 5.1

JEL Classification: K10, K13, K31, K42

Suggested Citation

Long, Alex B., Whistleblowing Attorneys and Ethical Infrastructures (August 11, 2009). Maryland Law Review, Vol. 68, No. 4, pp. 101-162, 2009, University of Tennessee Legal Studies Research Paper No. 70, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1447429

Alex B. Long (Contact Author)

University of Tennessee College of Law ( email )

1505 West Cumberland Ave.
Knoxville, TN 37996
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
158
Abstract Views
970
Rank
338,002
PlumX Metrics