Providing Managerial Incentives: Cash Flows Versus Accrual Accounting

43 Pages Posted: 8 Jan 1999

See all articles by Stefan J. Reichelstein

Stefan J. Reichelstein

Stanford University - Stanford Graduate School of Business; CESifo (Center for Economic Studies and Ifo Institute)

Multiple version iconThere are 2 versions of this paper

Abstract

This paper examines a multi-period agency model in which a manager makes investment decisions in each period. Performance measures based only on realized cash flows are essentially uninformative about value creation at any intermediate point in time. If the principal has access to additional project information which allows for a proper matching of a project's periodic cash flows with a share of the original investment cost, then the value created by the manager can be assessed at intermediate points in time. Such matching can be achieved by means of an accrual accounting system with properly structured depreciation charges. We establish that performance evaluation based on accrual accounting data results in lower agency costs than performance evaluation based on realized cash flows only.

JEL Classification: G31, G32, M40, M46

Suggested Citation

Reichelstein, Stefan J., Providing Managerial Incentives: Cash Flows Versus Accrual Accounting. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=144811 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.144811

Stefan J. Reichelstein (Contact Author)

Stanford University - Stanford Graduate School of Business ( email )

655 Knight Way
Stanford, CA 94305-5015
United States
650-736-1129 (Phone)
650-725-7979 (Fax)

CESifo (Center for Economic Studies and Ifo Institute)

Poschinger Str. 5
Munich, DE-81679
Germany

HOME PAGE: http://www.CESifo.de

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
1,863
Abstract Views
8,306
Rank
16,816
PlumX Metrics