Locality Ranking Systems: Methodological Considerations and Evidence from State Rankings

Academy of Accounting and Financial Studies Journal, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 47-64, 2007

14 Pages Posted: 27 Aug 2009 Last revised: 10 May 2011

See all articles by Terrance Jalbert

Terrance Jalbert

University of Hawaii - Department of Business Administration

Josh Mason

affiliation not provided to SSRN

Date Written: 2007

Abstract

Several articles have ranked states and other localities based on their desirability as a location for doing business. The importance of properly conducting these studies can not be overstated. An inappropriate “bad” ranking can have a significant negative economic impact on an area. Similarly an inappropriate “positive” rating can lead businesspersons to establish businesses in suboptimal locations. Despite the importance of these rankings, surprisingly little research has been done on the issues involved in developing the rankings. In this paper the methodologies used by three studies are examined. The sensitivity of rankings to changes in methodology utilized is examined. A change in methodology is found to result in ranking change of up to twenty two places in a ranking of 50 items. The paper also demonstrates how changing methodologies affects the weightings of the variables in the index. Finally, the paper demonstrates how the inclusion of additional variables affects the rankings.

Keywords: State Rankings, Tax Systems, Places to do Business

JEL Classification: H2, H71

Suggested Citation

Jalbert, Terrance and Mason, Josh, Locality Ranking Systems: Methodological Considerations and Evidence from State Rankings (2007). Academy of Accounting and Financial Studies Journal, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 47-64, 2007, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1461851

Terrance Jalbert (Contact Author)

University of Hawaii - Department of Business Administration ( email )

808-974-7456 (Phone)

Josh Mason

affiliation not provided to SSRN ( email )

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
47
Abstract Views
572
PlumX Metrics