Bank Credit Card Charges and the Interest Free Period: Balancing Equity and Efficiency

King's College Law Journal, Vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 119-145, 2007

26 Pages Posted: 31 Aug 2009

See all articles by Razeen Sappideen

Razeen Sappideen

Western Sydney University, School of Law

Date Written: August 31, 2009

Abstract

There has been a continuous debate on the role and impact of credit cards and whether some practices adopted by this industry should be regulated. Regulators have been concerned about the interest rates and charges levied by card systems generally, and in particular with the shifting of the incidence of some of the costs of card operations to transactions where payment is made other than by credit card. While the cross subsidy problem arising from the latter practice has been addressed in relation to the interchange fee concerning cash payers, card users, merchants, and banks, no serious attempt has been made to address the problem of cross subsidies made in favour of credit card users who pay their debts within the interest free period by those who are unable to pay their debts in time. Consequently, there has arisen a form of upside down equity where the poor generally are subsidising the rich. This paper addresses this latter issue and suggests that the way to eliminate this problem of upside down equity is to adopt a user pay system.

Keywords: transactors, revolvers, acquirers, issuers, cardholders, shifting incidence

Suggested Citation

Sappideen, Razeen, Bank Credit Card Charges and the Interest Free Period: Balancing Equity and Efficiency (August 31, 2009). King's College Law Journal, Vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 119-145, 2007, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1464592

Razeen Sappideen (Contact Author)

Western Sydney University, School of Law ( email )

Locked Bag 1797
Penrith, NSW 2751
Australia

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
87
Abstract Views
746
Rank
528,130
PlumX Metrics