The Political Economy of Youngstown

79 Pages Posted: 16 Sep 2009 Last revised: 23 Nov 2009

See all articles by Edward T. Swaine

Edward T. Swaine

George Washington University Law School

Date Written: September 16, 2009

Abstract

The time is ripe for a non-doctrinal assessment of Justice Jackson’s famous three-category framework for challenges to presidential action, elaborated in Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer (also known as the Steel Seizure Case). Recent national security controversies have given the Youngstown framework a whole new lease on life, and its relevance for courts, Congress, and executive branch officials has never been higher. During the same period, empirical and analytical studies of presidential policymaking have advanced beyond personality-driven accounts of particular administrations. Together, these developments offer a terrific opportunity to assess how well the Youngstown framework fulfills its objective of advancing congressional interests and constraining presidential power.

A political economy approach better explains the problem to which Justice Jackson was responding - the capacity of presidential unilateralism to establish policy that can withstand statutory correction, regardless of whether it has a legal basis - and also explains more formally how Youngstown’s categories offer a practical, if legally unorthodox, constraint. The assessment becomes more negative, though, once those categories are treated endogenously - that is, once the political branches are modeled as behaving dynamically and reacting to the framework itself. For example, both empirical surveys of executive orders and case studies suggest that the President may react to the risk of legislative disapproval (which under Youngstown will likely result in judicial disapproval as well) by avoiding Congress altogether or by seeking only its indirect blessing. Because these and other results disserve the framework’s objectives, this Article proposes several more benign alternatives - and, in general, advocates re-seizing Steel Seizure.

Keywords: Foreign Relations Law, International Law, National Security Law, Constitutional Law

JEL Classification: K00, K19, K29, K33, K39

Suggested Citation

Swaine, Edward, The Political Economy of Youngstown (September 16, 2009). Southern California Law Review, Forthcoming, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1474320

Edward Swaine (Contact Author)

George Washington University Law School ( email )

2000 H Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20052
United States
202-994-0608 (Phone)

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
197
Abstract Views
1,566
Rank
278,639
PlumX Metrics