Volatility and the Natural Resource Curse

Posted: 23 Sep 2009

Date Written: October 2009

Abstract

We provide cross-country evidence that rejects the traditional interpretation of the natural resource curse. First, growth depends negatively on volatility of unanticipated output growth independent of initial income, investment, human capital, trade openness, natural resource dependence, and population growth. Second, the direct positive effect of resources on growth is swamped by the indirect negative effect through volatility. Third, with well developed financial sectors, the resource curse is less pronounced. Fourth, landlocked countries with ethnic tensions have higher volatility and lower growth. Fifth, restrictions on the current account raise volatility and depress growth whereas capital account restrictions lower volatility and boost growth. Our key message is thus that volatility is a quintessential feature of the resource curse.

JEL Classification: C12, C21, C23, F43, G20, O11, O41, Q32

Suggested Citation

van der Ploeg, Frederick and Poelhekke, Steven, Volatility and the Natural Resource Curse (October 2009). Oxford Economic Papers, Vol. 61, Issue 4, pp. 727-760, 2009, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1477250 or http://dx.doi.org/gpp027

Frederick Van der Ploeg (Contact Author)

University of Oxford ( email )

Manor Road Building
Manor Road
Oxford, OX1 3BJ
United Kingdom

Steven Poelhekke

University of Auckland ( email )

Auckland
New Zealand

HOME PAGE: http://https://sites.google.com/site/stevenpoelhekke/

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
1,610
PlumX Metrics