Brokers and Advisers-What’s in a Name?

Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law, Vol. 11, p. 31, 2005

U of Cincinnati Public Law Research Paper No. 09-29

27 Pages Posted: 12 Oct 2009

See all articles by Barbara Black

Barbara Black

University of Cincinnati - College of Law

Date Written: October 15, 2009

Abstract

The article addresses two recent developments - the adoption by the SEC of a rule that allows brokerage firms to market fee-based accounts without registering as investment advisers and the increase in brokerage advertising that promotes the image of the broker as a trusted family friend and financial adviser. Professor Black argues that as a result of these developments investors are likely to be misled into believing that their brokers are investment advisers, with the fiduciary obligations the law requires of them, instead of brokers, whom the law generally treats as salespersons. She proposes two recommendations: (1) that brokers should not be allowed to call themselves "financial advisers" or "financial consultants"; or, assuming the SEC will not adopt this recommendation, (2) brokers should be held to their word and be obligated to provide the "competent, unbiased and continuous advice" that they promise.

Suggested Citation

Black, Barbara, Brokers and Advisers-What’s in a Name? (October 15, 2009). Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law, Vol. 11, p. 31, 2005, U of Cincinnati Public Law Research Paper No. 09-29, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1487706

Barbara Black (Contact Author)

University of Cincinnati - College of Law ( email )

P.O. Box 210040
Cincinnati, OH 45221-0040
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
150
Abstract Views
1,536
Rank
352,794
PlumX Metrics