Do Audit Actions Consistent with Increased Auditor Scepticism Deter Potential Management Malfeasance?

49 Pages Posted: 19 Oct 2009 Last revised: 28 May 2010

See all articles by Qiu Chen

Qiu Chen

University of Ottawa

Khim Kelly

University of Central Florida

Steven Salterio

Queen's University - Smith School of Business

Date Written: October 15, 2009

Abstract

Effective audits are claimed to not only enhance the detection of fraud but also the deterrence of potential fraud. We conduct an experiment with 167 senior corporate managers in which we examine whether changes in auditor actions and behaviours consistent with auditors exhibiting a heightened level of professional scepticism deter managers from committing corporate malfeasance. We examine three audit action changes: an increase in management inquiry rigour, an increase in the extent of the audit sample and a change in the nature of the audit tests. All of these changes are situated in an experimental design where the objective probability of detecting managerial malfeasance does not change and managerial malfeasance can occur in the same period as the audit action changes. We find that changing the nature of the evidence collected decreases participating managers’ intention to commit corporate malfeasance. Furthermore, we find that the most common auditor response in practice, increasing the extent of the sample without changing tests, does not reduce managers’ intention to commit malfeasance. Finally, we find that combining the use of more critical client questioning with increasing extent of testing does result in less managerial intent to commit malfeasance. Implications of these findings are discussed.

Keywords: professional scepticism, management malfeasance, fraud, deterrence, effective audits, types of audit evidence, cost allocation

JEL Classification: M4, M40, M41

Suggested Citation

Chen, Qiu and Kelly, Khim and Salterio, Steven E., Do Audit Actions Consistent with Increased Auditor Scepticism Deter Potential Management Malfeasance? (October 15, 2009). CAAA Annual Conference 2010, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1490123 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1490123

Qiu Chen

University of Ottawa ( email )

Ottawa, Ontario K1N 6N5
Canada

Khim Kelly

University of Central Florida ( email )

12744 Pegaus Dr
Orlando, FL 32816
United States

Steven E. Salterio (Contact Author)

Queen's University - Smith School of Business ( email )

Kingston, Ontario K7L 3N6
Canada
613-533-6926 (Phone)

HOME PAGE: http://smith.queensu.ca/faculty_and_research/faculty_list/salterio-steven.php

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
258
Abstract Views
989
Rank
121,651
PlumX Metrics