Are We There Yet?: Towards a New Rule for Choice of Law in Tort

Osgoode Hall Law Journal, Vol. 38, pp. 331-67, 2000

37 Pages Posted: 19 Oct 2009

See all articles by Janet Walker

Janet Walker

York University - Osgoode Hall Law School

Date Written: April 19, 2000

Abstract

The Supreme Court of Canada's effort in Tolofson to establish certainty in choice of law in tort failed because the lex loci rule inadequately accounts for the social and legal context in which torts occur. Fairer, and more likely to create certainty, would be a rule that gave primacy to the legal system most closely connected with the relationship that gave rise to the duty of care. Such a rule would serve better than a rule that treated this factor as the basis for an exception or one that rejected its relevance altogether.

Keywords: conflict of laws, choice of law in tort

JEL Classification: K41, K33

Suggested Citation

Walker, Janet, Are We There Yet?: Towards a New Rule for Choice of Law in Tort (April 19, 2000). Osgoode Hall Law Journal, Vol. 38, pp. 331-67, 2000, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1491213

Janet Walker (Contact Author)

York University - Osgoode Hall Law School ( email )

4700 Keele Street
Toronto, Ontario M3J 1P3
Canada

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
135
Abstract Views
690
Rank
386,772
PlumX Metrics