Moment of Stasis: The Successful Failure of a Constitution for Europe

European Law Journal, Vol. 15, No. 3, pp. 309–323, May 2009

U. of Westminster School of Law Research Paper No. 10-07

16 Pages Posted: 30 Oct 2009

See all articles by Andreas Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos

Andreas Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos

University of Westminster, Westminster Law & Theory Centre

Abstract

The 2005 French and Dutch negative votes on the Constitution open up a space of conceptualisation, not only of Europe’s relation to its demos, but significantly to its failures. Through a critical analysis of mainly Niklas Luhmann’s systems theory, the article proposes taking a distance from traditional constitutional dogmatics that are no longer capable of dealing with the paradox of contemporary society, and more specifically with the eventual resurgence of the European project as one of absence and stasis: the two terms are used to explain the need, on the one hand, to maintain the ‘absent community’ of Europe, and, on the other, to start realising that any conceptualisation of the European project will now have to take place in that space of instability and contingency revealed by the constitutional failure. The relation between law and politics, the location of a constitution, the distinction between social and normative legitimacy, the connection between European identity and demos, and the concept of continuity between constitutional text and context are revisited in an attempt to trace the constitutional failure as the constitutional moment par excellence.

Keywords: Constitutional Theory, European Constitution, EU law, Luhmann, Systems Theory, Autopoiesis, Derrida

JEL Classification: K1, K49

Suggested Citation

Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos, Andreas, Moment of Stasis: The Successful Failure of a Constitution for Europe. European Law Journal, Vol. 15, No. 3, pp. 309–323, May 2009, U. of Westminster School of Law Research Paper No. 10-07, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1496302

Andreas Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos (Contact Author)

University of Westminster, Westminster Law & Theory Centre ( email )

School of Law, University of Westminster
4-12 Little Titchfield Street
London, W1W7UW
United Kingdom

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
84
Abstract Views
595
Rank
539,593
PlumX Metrics