A Bootstrap Evaluation of the Effect of Data Splitting on Financial Time Series

8 Pages Posted: 22 Jan 1997

See all articles by Blake LeBaron

Blake LeBaron

Brandeis University - International Business School

Andreas Weigend

Stern School of Business, New York University

Multiple version iconThere are 2 versions of this paper

Date Written: December 1996

Abstract

This article exposes problems of the commonly used technique of splitting the available data into training, validation, and test sets that are held fixed, warns about drawing too strong conclusions from such static splits, and shows potential pitfalls of ignoring variability across splits. Using a bootstrap or resampling method, we compare the uncertainty in the solution stemming from the data splitting with neural network specific uncertainties (parameter initialization, choice of number of hidden units, etc.). We present two results on data from the New York Stock Exchange. First, the variation due to different resamplings is significantly larger than the variation due to different network conditions. This result implies that it is important to not over-interpret a model, or an ensemble of models, estimated on one specific split of the data. Second, on each split, the neural network solution with early stopping is very close to a linear model; no significant nonlinearities are extracted.

JEL Classification: G1, C5

Suggested Citation

LeBaron, Blake D. and Weigend, Andreas, A Bootstrap Evaluation of the Effect of Data Splitting on Financial Time Series (December 1996). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1504 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1504

Blake D. LeBaron (Contact Author)

Brandeis University - International Business School ( email )

Mailstop 32
Waltham, MA 02454-9110
United States
781-736-2258 (Phone)
781-736-2269 (Fax)

Andreas Weigend

Stern School of Business, New York University ( email )

MEC 9-74
New York, NY 10012
United States
212-998-0803 (Phone)
212-995-4228 (Fax)

HOME PAGE: http://www.weigend.com