Response: ‘And it Really Was a Kitten, after All.’

33 Aust. J. Legal Philosophy 173-78, 2008

5 Pages Posted: 2 Aug 2012

See all articles by Desmond Manderson

Desmond Manderson

ANU College of Law; ANU College of Arts and Social Sciences; McGill University - Faculty of Law

Date Written: 2008

Abstract

This essay is the author response to a symposium on Proximity, Levinas and the Soul of Law published in the Australian Journal of Legal Philosophy in 2008.

Keywords: torts, proximity, Levinas, legal theory

Suggested Citation

Manderson, Desmond, Response: ‘And it Really Was a Kitten, after All.’ (2008). 33 Aust. J. Legal Philosophy 173-78, 2008, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1515426

Desmond Manderson (Contact Author)

ANU College of Law; ANU College of Arts and Social Sciences ( email )

Canberra, Australian Capital Territory 0200
Australia

HOME PAGE: http://https://researchers.anu.edu.au/researchers/manderson-dra

McGill University - Faculty of Law ( email )

Canada

HOME PAGE: http://https://researchers.anu.edu.au/researchers/manderson-dra

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
45
Abstract Views
359
PlumX Metrics