Debt Maturity Structure of Chinese Companies
Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Vol. 16, pp. 268–297, 2008
40 Pages Posted: 7 Dec 2009
Date Written: December 2, 2009
Abstract
Numerous studies have focused on the theoretical and empirical aspects of corporate capital structure since the 1960s. As a new branch of capital structure, however, debt maturity structure has not yet received as much attention as the debt-equity choice. We use the existing theories of corporate debt maturity to investigate the potential determinants of debt maturity of the Chinese listed firms. In addition to the traditional estimation methods, the system-GMM technique is used to explicitly control for the endogeneity problem. We find that the size of the firm, asset maturity and liquidity have significant effects in extending the maturity of debt employed by Chinese companies. The amount of collateralized assets and growth opportunities also tend to be important. However, proxies for a firm’s quality and effective tax rate apparently report mixed or unexpected results. Debt market and equity market conditions are also examined in relation to corporate loan maturity. The system-GMM results show that market factors seem to influence debt maturity decisions. Finally, corporate equity ownership structure has also been found to have some impact on debt maturity mix.
Keywords: Chinese firms, corporate debt maturity, system-GMM, market conditions, ownership structure
JEL Classification: G3, G32
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
By Grzegorz Pawlina and Luc Renneboog
-
The Managerial Labour Market and the Governance Role of Shareholder Control Structures in the UK
-
By Hyun-han Shin and Yong H. Kim
-
The Underinvestment and Overinvestment Hypotheses: An Analysis Using Panel Data
By Arthur Morgado and Julio Pindado
-
Investment and Internal Finance: Asymmetric Information or Managerial Discretion?
By Abe De Jong and Hans Degryse
-
Leverage, Debt Maturity and Firm Investment: An Empirical Analysis