Judicial Attitudes to Gender Justice in India: The Contribution of Judicial Training

Warwick School of Law Research Paper Series

ICFAI Journal of Employment Law, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 49-66, October 2003

21 Pages Posted: 5 Jan 2010

See all articles by Ann Stewart

Ann Stewart

University of Warwick - School of Law

Date Written: 2001

Abstract

Law related strategies have played an important part in the campaigns of women’s organisations to achieve greater equality and social justice within their societies. These campaigns have focussed on the role of the nation state to improve the rights of women across a wide range of areas such as reproduction, property ownership, prevention of violence and employment protection. These campaigns have increasingly been informed by the international women’s rights discourse. Many women’s organisations use the processes associated with the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women to put pressure on their governments (Connors, 1996; Charlesworth and Chinkin, 2000: ch 7). One method, which has proven significant, has been the submission by non-governmental organisations (ngos) of alternative reports on CEDAW. For instance, the Indian ngos published the report which they submitted in January 2000 to shadow the Indian government’s submission to the UN committee (National Alliance of Women, 2000). Some of the campaigns have led to law reforms (see for instance Vishaka vs. State of Rajasthan 1997 SCC 384). However the implementation of reforms through the administration of justice systems have often proven highly problematic. The judiciary is seen at best as indifferent or, at worst, hostile to developing a legal culture based on gender justice (Sakshi, 1996).

Reformers in a number of common law jurisdictions have seen training judges in gender issues as one way of tackling this problem. However such training presents considerable challenges for both educators and recipients and raises a range of questions. Some of these relate to judicial independence and others concern the effectiveness of such activities in bringing about recognisable improvements in gender justice. I will draw on the debates relating to judicial training in the US, Canada, Australia, and England as well as the specific experiences of gender initiatives in common law countries in order to set our project in India into a wider context.

Keywords: India, Judges, Training, Judiciary, Gender, CEDAW, Judicial Education, Accountability, Equality, Project

Suggested Citation

Stewart, Ann, Judicial Attitudes to Gender Justice in India: The Contribution of Judicial Training (2001). Warwick School of Law Research Paper Series, ICFAI Journal of Employment Law, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 49-66, October 2003, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1531148

Ann Stewart (Contact Author)

University of Warwick - School of Law ( email )

Gibbet Hill Road
Coventry CV4 7AL, CV4 7AL
United Kingdom
02476 523207 (Phone)
02476 524105 (Fax)

HOME PAGE: http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/law/staff/academic/stewart

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
885
Abstract Views
3,953
Rank
49,785
PlumX Metrics