Manumission in Nineteenth Century Virginia

37 Pages Posted: 1 Feb 2010 Last revised: 31 May 2023

See all articles by Howard Bodenhorn

Howard Bodenhorn

National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER); John E. Walker Department of Economics, Clemson University

Date Written: January 2010

Abstract

A long-standing debate concerns the rationality of slave owners and this paper addresses that debate within the context of manumission. Using a new sample of 19th-century Virginia manumissions, I show that manumission was associated with the productive characteristics of slaves. More productive slaves were manumitted at younger ages than less productive slaves. Although more productive slaves were more valuable to slave owners, which might be expected to delay manumission, more productive slaves faced more attractive labor market opportunities outside slavery, which elicited greater effort within slavery in order to buy their way out of slavery. Further, this paper addresses three important and two emergent literatures: the economics of slavery; the economics of stature; and the economics of complexion. The results reveal that height, complexion, and sex were the principal determinants of age at manumission.

Suggested Citation

Bodenhorn, Howard, Manumission in Nineteenth Century Virginia (January 2010). NBER Working Paper No. w15704, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1544754

Howard Bodenhorn (Contact Author)

National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)

1050 Massachusetts Avenue
Cambridge, MA 02138
United States

John E. Walker Department of Economics, Clemson University ( email )

Clemson, SC 29631
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
24
Abstract Views
390
PlumX Metrics