Social Welfare Versus Inequality Concerns in an Incomplete Contract Experiment
50 Pages Posted: 8 Feb 2010
Date Written: January 2010
Abstract
We study a situation where two players first choose a sharing rule, then invest into a joint production process, and then split joint benefits. We investigate how social preferences determine investments. In our experiment we find that even the materially disadvantaged player cares more for social welfare than about inequality. Behavioral preferences of disadvantaged players actually increase inequality. We also investigate when players give up an advantageous sharing rule. Power-sharing can be successful in the experiment, even when it is not in a selfish world.
Keywords: experiments, incomplete contracts, relationship-specific investment, allocation of power, social preferences
JEL Classification: C91, D23, D86
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Contracts as Reference Points - Experimental Evidence
By Ernst Fehr, Oliver Hart, ...
-
Contracts as Reference Points: Experimental Evidence
By Ernst Fehr, Oliver Hart, ...
-
Contracts as Reference Points - Experimental Evidence
By Ernst Fehr, Oliver Hart, ...
-
By Oliver Hart and John Moore
-
By Oliver Hart and John Moore
-
By Oliver Hart and John Moore
-
Shifting the Blame: On Delegation and Responsibility
By Björn Bartling and Urs Fischbacher
-
Agreeing Now to Agree Later: Contracts that Rule Out But Do Not Rule in
By Oliver Hart and John Moore
-
Agreeing Now to Agree Later: Contracts that Rule Out But Do Not Rule in
By Oliver Hart and John Moore