Intra-Organizational Provincialism

39 Pages Posted: 15 Feb 2010

See all articles by Markus G. Reitzig

Markus G. Reitzig

University of Vienna

Olav Sorenson

Yale School of Management; University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) - Policy Area

Date Written: February 12, 2010

Abstract

In contrast to prior studies, which have generally argued that the failure of innovations to diffuse within an organization stems from informational or motivational difficulties, we propose that the failure to adopt an innovation can also arise from a form of organizational provincialism. Individuals identify with their subunits within the organization and therefore tend to have biased perceptions against ideas that emerge from other parts of the organization. To explore this idea, this study uses data on innovations inside a large, multinational consumer goods firm to analyze the effects of evaluator and innovator identities on the probability that the evaluator considered the idea of high potential. The results reveal that evaluators are biased in favor of ideas submitted by individuals that work in the same division and facility as they do. The strength of this bias, moreover, decreases with the size of the evaluator’s subunit and with the size and status of the submitter’s subunit.

Keywords: in-group bias, provincialism, innovation, NIH syndrom

Suggested Citation

Reitzig, Markus G. and Sorenson, Olav, Intra-Organizational Provincialism (February 12, 2010). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1552059 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1552059

Markus G. Reitzig (Contact Author)

University of Vienna ( email )

Bruenner Strasse 72
Vienna, Vienna 1090
Austria

Olav Sorenson

Yale School of Management ( email )

135 Prospect Street
P.O. Box 208200
New Haven, CT 06520-8200
United States

University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) - Policy Area ( email )

110 Westwood Plaza
Los Angeles, CA 90095
United States
(310) 825-7348 (Phone)
(310) 206-3337 (Fax)

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
229
Abstract Views
2,416
Rank
244,485
PlumX Metrics