Vertical Bargaining and Countervailing Power
CEIS Working Paper No. 160
27 Pages Posted: 3 Mar 2010 Last revised: 25 Feb 2014
Date Written: March 2, 2010
Abstract
We study the existence of countervailing buyer power in a vertical industry where the input price is set via Nash bargainings between one upstream supplier and many differentiated but competing retailers. In case one bilateral bargaining fails, the supplier still has the ability to sell to the other retailers. We show that the capacity of these other retailers to react in the final market has a dramatic impact on the supplier’s outside options and, ultimately, on input prices and welfare. Under downstream quantity competition, we find either no or opposite support to the hypothesis of countervailing power on input prices, as the retail industry becomes more concentrated. With price competition, we find a case for countervailing power, but its existence depends on the degree of product differentiation and on the ability of competing retailers to react to a disagreement.
Keywords: Countervailing buyer power, Nash bargaining
JEL Classification: L50
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Vertical Integration in the Presence of Upstream Competition
-
By Celine Bonnet and Pierre Dubois
-
By Jonas Bjornerstedt and Johan Stennek
-
Concentration-Based Merger Tests and Vertical Market Structure
-
Can Vertical Integration by a Monopsonist Harm Consumer Welfare?
-
Vertical Contracting When Competition for Orders Precedes Procurement
-
Exclusivity, Competition and the Irrelevance of Internal Investment
By Catherine De Fontenay, Vivienne Groves, ...