Open Market Valuation of Player Performance in Cricket: Evidence from the Indian Premier League

21 Pages Posted: 31 Jul 2010

See all articles by Craig A. Depken

Craig A. Depken

University of North Carolina at Charlotte - The Belk College of Business Administration - Department of Economics

Ramakrishna Rajasekhar

University of North Carolina (UNC) at Charlotte - Department of Finance & Business Law

Date Written: April 1, 2010

Abstract

This paper investigates the final bid prices for players during the first three seasons of the Indian Premier League (IPL). Although the IPL imposes a salary cap and other labor-market restrictions, it is anticipated that final bid prices reflect the aggregate value of player productivity statistics, potential leadership skills, and auction characteristics. The empirical analysis follows the methodology used to investigate wage determination in other professional sports. We find that cricketer salaries are influenced by player characteristics and that the marginal values have not been changing during the first three years of the league. We find little evidence for systematic wage discrimination against players who are not Indian nationals. We also find little evidence for systematic differences in average salaries paid across the eight franchises in the league.

Keywords: professional sports, auctions, discrimination

JEL Classification: L83, J31, J70

Suggested Citation

Depken, Craig A. and Rajasekhar, Ramakrishna, Open Market Valuation of Player Performance in Cricket: Evidence from the Indian Premier League (April 1, 2010). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1593196 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1593196

Craig A. Depken (Contact Author)

University of North Carolina at Charlotte - The Belk College of Business Administration - Department of Economics ( email )

Charlotte, NC 28223
United States

Ramakrishna Rajasekhar

University of North Carolina (UNC) at Charlotte - Department of Finance & Business Law ( email )

9201 University City Blvd.
Charlotte, NC 28223
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
629
Abstract Views
2,932
Rank
78,751
PlumX Metrics