Transitoriness of Market Power and Antitrust Activity

Posted: 14 Jun 2010

Date Written: June 2010

Abstract

The economic rationale for how much market power is tolerable has so far been based mainly on static considerations; ideally, however, it should discriminate between persistent and transitory market power. I propose a dynamic dominant-firm type of model where the firm's use of market power, when it is discovered by an antitrust agency, will be penalized. Equilibrium entails a threshold market share above which the market tends toward monopoly and below which the market tends to competition. One may propose the region below this threshold to be the safety zone. The size of this region depends on how fast market power depreciates. In industries in which this depreciation is fast and where, as a result, monopoly power is more transitory, the safety zone should be wider, and there should be less policy intervention.

Keywords: L10, L20, L40

Suggested Citation

Kato, Mika, Transitoriness of Market Power and Antitrust Activity (June 2010). Journal of Competition Law and Economics, Vol. 6, Issue 2, pp. 393-421, 2010, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1624151 or http://dx.doi.org/nhp019

Mika Kato (Contact Author)

Howard University ( email )

2400 Sixth Street, NW
Washington, DC 20059
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
421
PlumX Metrics