Overborrowing, Financial Crises and 'Macro-Prudential' Taxes
62 Pages Posted: 21 Jun 2010 Last revised: 21 Jun 2023
Date Written: June 2010
Abstract
An equilibrium model of financial crises driven by Irving Fisher's financial amplification mechanism features a pecuniary externality, because private agents do not internalize how the price of assets used for collateral respond to collective borrowing decisions, particularly when binding collateral constraints cause asset fire-sales and lead to a financial crisis. As a result, agents in the competitive equilibrium borrow "too much" ex ante, compared with a financial regulator who internalizes the externality. Quantitative analysis calibrated to U.S. data shows that average debt and leverage are only slightly larger in the competitive equilibrium, but the incidence and magnitude of financial crises are much larger. Excess asset returns, Sharpe ratios and the price of risk are also much larger, and the distribution of returns displays endogenous fat tails. State-contingent taxes on debt and dividends of about 1 and -0.5 percent on average respectively support the regulator's allocations as a competitive equilibrium.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Managing Credit Booms and Busts: A Pigouvian Taxation Approach
By Olivier Jeanne and Anton Korinek
-
Managing Credit Booms and Busts: A Pigouvian Taxation Approach
By Olivier Jeanne and Anton Korinek
-
Managing Credit Booms and Busts: A Pigouvian Taxation Approach
By Olivier Jeanne and Anton Korinek
-
Overborrowing and Systemic Externalities in the Business Cycle
-
Systemic Risk-Taking: Amplification Effects, Externalities, and Regulatory Responses
-
Systemic Risk-Taking: Amplification Effects, Externalities, and Regulatory Responses
-
Real Exchange Rate Volatility and the Price of Nontradables in Sudden-Stop-Prone Economies