The Firing Cost Implications of Alternative Severance Pay Designs
26 Pages Posted: 29 Jun 2010
Abstract
Economists have concerns about the firing cost implications of mandated severance plans. Analysis reveals that predicted severance plan consequences depend critically on the precise structure of the plan. Whether governments mandate (i) severance insurance plans or (ii) severance savings plans is important; savings plans have no "firing cost" effects on employer layoff decisions. The firing cost implications of insurance plan are sensitive to the types of job separations that qualify a worker for benefits. Plans that pay benefits across all separations are functionally severance savings plans. The variety of plan types is illustrated using U.S. and international examples.
Keywords: job displacement, worker turnover, severance pay, firing costs
JEL Classification: J65, J41, J33
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Trends in Severance Pay Coverage in the United States, 1980-2001
By John Bishow and Donald O. Parsons
-
Private Job Displacement Insurance in the United States, 1954-1979: Expansion and Innovation
-
Insuring Displaced Workers: Human Capital Losses and Severance Pay Design
By Shuaizhang Feng and Donald O. Parsons
-
Benefit Generosity in Voluntary Severance Plans: The U.S. Experience
-
Private Job Displacement Insurance: Information Asymmetries and Separation Pay Design
-
Compensation Supplements and the Use of Incentive Pay in Us Job Markets
-
An Estimate of End-of-Service Benefit Liabilities in the Gulf Cooperation Council
By Zaki Zahran