A Model-Based Evaluation of the Debate on the Size of the Tax Multiplier
29 Pages Posted: 19 Jul 2010
There are 2 versions of this paper
A Model-Based Evaluation of the Debate on the Size of the Tax Multiplier
Date Written: July 2010
Abstract
The SVAR and narrative approaches to estimating tax multipliers deliver significantly different results. The former yields multipliers of about 1 percent, whereas the latter produces much larger multipliers of about 3 percent. The SVAR and narrative approaches differ along two important dimensions: the identification scheme and the reduced-form transmission mechanism. This paper uses a DSGE-model approach to evaluate the hypothesis that the different tax multipliers stemming from the SVAR and narrative approaches are due to differences in the assumed reduced-form transmission mechanisms. The main finding of the paper is that in the context of the DSGE model employed this hypothesis is rejected. Instead, the observed differences in estimated multipliers are due either to both models failing to identify the same tax shock, or to small-sample uncertainty.
Keywords: DSGE Model, Narrative Approach, Tax Multiplier, VAR tax shocks
JEL Classification: E32, E62, H30
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Costly Capital Reallocation and the Effects of Government Spending
-
What are the Effects of Fiscal Policy Shocks?
By Harald Uhlig and Andrew Mountford
-
What are the Effects of Fiscal Policy Shocks?
By Andrew Mountford and Harald Uhlig
-
What are the Effects of Fiscal Policy Shocks?
By Andrew Mountford and Harald Uhlig
-
Understanding the Effects of Government Spending on Consumption
By Jordi Galí, David Lopez-salido, ...
-
Understanding the Effects of Government Spending on Consumption
By Jordi Galí, David Lopez-salido, ...