Political Belief Networks: Socio-Cognitive Heterogeneity in American Public Opinion
44 Pages Posted: 19 Jul 2010 Last revised: 29 Sep 2013
Date Written: August 2010
Abstract
Most research on public opinion assumes that American political views are structured by a belief system with a clearly-defined liberal-conservative polarity; however, this is not true of all Americans. In this article we document systematic heterogeneity in the organization of political attitudes and explain its basis in the sociodemographic profile of the respondents.
We use Relational Class Analysis (RCA), a network-based method for detecting heterogeneity in collective patterns of opinion, to identify distinctive belief networks, each shared by a different group of respondents. Analyzing ANES data between 1984 and 2004, we identify three groups of American citizens that remain stable throughout this period: it Ideologues, whose political attitudes strongly align with either liberal or conservative categories; Alternatives, who are instead morally conservative but economically liberal, or vice versa; and Agnostics, who exhibit weak associations among political beliefs.
Respondents’ sociodemographic profiles, particularly their income, education, and religiosity, lie at the core of the different ways in which they understand politics. When their economic interests and social identities are incompatible with the traditional liberal-conservative polarity (e.g., high earners with weak religious commitments), individuals gravitate toward alternative ways of conceptualizing the political debate. These results raise important methodological questions concerning the assumption of population homogeneity.
Keywords: belief networks, public opinion, constraint, political belief system, political cognition, heterogeneity, income and religiosity
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Political Polarization and Income Inequality
By Nolan Mccarty, Keith T. Poole, ...
-
Rich State, Poor State, Red State, Blue State: What's the Matter with Connecticut?
By Andrew Gelman, Boris Shor, ...
-
A Bayesian Multilevel Modeling Approach to Time-Series Cross-Sectional Data
By Boris Shor, Joseph Bafumi, ...
-
Partisans Without Constraint: Political Polarization and Trends in American Public Opinion
By Delia Baldassarri and Andrew Gelman
-
Fitting Multilevel Models When Predictors and Group Effects Correlate
By Joseph Bafumi and Andrew Gelman
-
United We Divide?: Education, Income, and Heterogeneity in Mass Partisan Polarization
-
Economic Trends and Judicial Outcomes: A Macrotheory of the Court
By Thomas J. Brennan, Lee Epstein, ...
-
Income and Vote Choice in the 2000 Mexican Presidential Election
By Andrew Gelman and Jeronimo Cortina
-
Poisson Games, Strategic Candidacy, and Duverger's Law
By Yuelan Chen