Alignment and Misalignment of Technology Push and Regulatory Pull: Federal RD&D Support for SO₂ and NOx Emissions Control Technology for Coal-Fired Power Plants, 1970-2000

24 Pages Posted: 30 Sep 2010 Last revised: 18 Jul 2014

See all articles by David M. Hart

David M. Hart

Schar School of Policy and Government; Information Technology and Innovation Foundation

Kadri Kallas

George Mason University - School of Policy, Government, and International Affairs

Date Written: April 13, 2010

Abstract

This paper relies on interviews and documentary evidence to describe federal RD&D policy for SO2 and NOx emissions controls for coal-fired power plants from 1970 to 2000 and to assess its impact on technology development. The narrative begins by describing the RD&D program of the EPA in the 1970s, which many observers deem to have been successful, but which was largely dismantled after the election of Ronald Reagan to the presidency in 1980. We then turn to the contributions of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), which has been the main federal agency operating in this area since 1980, and particularly to DOE’s Clean Coal Technology Demonstration Program (CCTDP), which began in 1985. The narrative as a whole suggests a mixed verdict on the effectiveness of past federal emissions control RD&D.

In the paper’s conclusion, we mine this narrative history for insights that may be useful to current policy-makers. We argue first that regulatory pull is a necessary component for an effective greenhouse gas reduction policy, while technology push is not. However, a well-designed technology push may enhance the impact of regulation and lower the cost of compliance. Second, we should not expect that these two components will be well-aligned, due to the differences in the institutional frameworks for making the two types of policy. Third, RD&D policy should not be judged a failure if the technological options it supports are not widely commercialized or adopted. Instead, the standard should be whether RD&D led to options that might have been widely adopted if circumstances (regulatory, market, and technical) had been somewhat different. Determining what constitutes a plausible range of circumstances for application of this standard is a job that should be delegated to program managers, who must be able to exercise independent judgment, advised by technical experts who are drawn from diverse backgrounds.

Keywords: Energy, R&D, Emissions Control, Government Policy

Suggested Citation

Hart, David M. and Kallas, Kadri, Alignment and Misalignment of Technology Push and Regulatory Pull: Federal RD&D Support for SO₂ and NOx Emissions Control Technology for Coal-Fired Power Plants, 1970-2000 (April 13, 2010). GMU School of Public Policy Research Paper No. 23, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1651337 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1651337

David M. Hart (Contact Author)

Schar School of Policy and Government ( email )

Founders Hall, Fifth Floor
3351 Fairfax Drive, MS 3B1
Arlington, VA 22201
United States

Information Technology and Innovation Foundation ( email )

701 K St., NW, Suite 600
Washington, DC District of Columbia 20001
United States

Kadri Kallas

George Mason University - School of Policy, Government, and International Affairs ( email )

Founders Hall
3351 Fairfax Dr.
Arlington, VA 22201
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
79
Abstract Views
774
Rank
559,428
PlumX Metrics