Explaining Midterm Loss: The Tandem Effects of Withdrawn Coattails and Balancing
43 Pages Posted: 14 Aug 2010
Date Written: August 12, 2010
Abstract
This paper tests coattail and balancing theories of midterm loss in congressional elections. Neither theory can by itself account for the regularity of midterm loss. But together they can. When, following a close presidential election, there are no coattails to withdraw, ideological balancing at midterm generates a loss for the presidential party. When voters can anticipate a presidential landslide allowing them to balance their congressional vote in the presidential year, the winner’s coattails are withdrawn at midterm. Either way, the presidential party loses seats. Testing the variables of each theory while controlling for those of the other, this paper finds strong statistical evidence that both process are at work to insure midterm loss.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
By Justin Wolfers and Eric Zitzewitz
-
By Justin Wolfers and Eric Zitzewitz
-
What Do Financial Markets Think of War in Iraq?
By Andrew Leigh, Justin Wolfers, ...
-
What Do Financial Markets Think of War in Iraq?
By Andrew Leigh, Justin Wolfers, ...
-
Interpreting Prediction Market Prices as Probabilities
By Justin Wolfers and Eric Zitzewitz
-
Interpreting Prediction Market Prices as Probabilities
By Justin Wolfers and Eric Zitzewitz
-
Interpreting Prediction Market Prices as Probabilities
By Justin Wolfers and Eric Zitzewitz
-
Did Steve Forbes Scare the Municipal Bond Market?
By Joel B. Slemrod and Timothy Greimel
-
Partisan Impacts on the Economy: Evidence from Prediction Markets and Close Elections
By Erik C. Snowberg, Justin Wolfers, ...