Hate Crimes Legislation and the Thirteenth Amendment

5 Pages Posted: 23 Aug 2010

See all articles by Alexander Tsesis

Alexander Tsesis

Florida State University College of Law

Date Written: August 15, 2009

Abstract

This year the House of Representatives and Senate passed two closely related but differently formulated hate crimes bills. The critical distinction between the two is that the Senate version relies on both the Thirteenth Amendment and Commerce Clause as the sources of Congress’s authority to pass hate crimes legislation (S. 909), while the House version only relies on the Commerce Clause (H. R. 1913).The difficulty with relying on the Thirteenth Amendment is that it would require extending its reach to groups that the Court has never recognized as falling under it: namely women, gays and lesbians, transsexuals, and transvestites, and the disabled. I think the stakes of crimes committed against these groups that don’t fall under the commerce provisions of S.A. 1511 make it imperative to try to extend the amendment’s applicability. Of course, the risk of this proposal is that the Court could find the law unconstitutional. So, I make two proposals: the first more risky than the second more pragmatic.

Keywords: Hate crimes, Thirteenth Amendment, constitutional law

JEL Classification: J7, J78

Suggested Citation

Tsesis, Alexander, Hate Crimes Legislation and the Thirteenth Amendment (August 15, 2009). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1662665 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1662665

Alexander Tsesis (Contact Author)

Florida State University College of Law ( email )

425 W Jefferson St
Tallahassee, FL 32301
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
58
Abstract Views
764
Rank
653,722
PlumX Metrics