Pension Plan Risk-Taking: Does It Matter If the Sponsor is Publicly-Traded?
37 Pages Posted: 3 Sep 2010
Date Written: August 2, 2010
Abstract
We use a large sample of private sponsors’ defined benefit pension plans to document economically significant differences in the magnitude of plan return volatility for private versus publicly-traded sponsors. The main drivers of pension plan risk taking are different for public and private firms. The impact of the funded status of pension liabilities on volatility for publicly-traded sponsors is more than two times higher than for private sponsors. The impact of sponsor contributions for private sponsors is more than four times higher than for public sponsors. The results suggest that the alignment of the incentives of owners and plan beneficiaries is different for private versus publicly-traded sponsors.
Keywords: Pension Funds, Risk-taking
JEL Classification: G23
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Investment and Financing Constraints: Evidence from the Funding of Corporate Pension Plans
-
Taxation and Corporate Pension Policy
By Irwin Tepper
-
Earnings Manipulation, Pension Assumptions and Managerial Investment Decisions
By Daniel Bergstresser, Joshua D. Rauh, ...
-
Earnings Manipulation, Pension Assumptions and Managerial Investment Decisions
By Daniel Bergstresser, Joshua D. Rauh, ...
-
Earnings Manipulation and Managerial Investment Decisions: Evidence from Sponsored Pension Plans
By Daniel Bergstresser, Joshua D. Rauh, ...
-
Funding and Asset Allocation in Corporate Pension Plans: an Empirical Investigation
By Zvi Bodie, Randall Morck, ...
-
Did Pension Plan Accounting Contribute to a Stock Market Bubble?