Expected Utility Theory and the Tyranny of Catastrophic Risks
19 Pages Posted: 11 Sep 2010
Date Written: 2010
Abstract
Expected Utility theory is not only applied to individual choices but also to ethical decisions, e.g. in cost-benefit analysis of climate change policy measures that affect future generations. In this context the crucial question arises whether EU theory is able to deal with "catastrophic risks," i.e. risks of high, but very unlikely losses, in an ethically appealing way. In this paper we show that this is not the case. Rather, if in the framework of EU theory a plausible level of risk aversion is assumed, a "tyranny of catastrophic risk" (TCR) emerges, i.e., project evaluation may be dominated by the catastrophic event even if its probability is negligibly small. With low degrees of risk aversion, however the catastrophic risk eventually has no impact at all when its probability goes to zero which is ethically not acceptable as well.
Keywords: Utilitarianism, Expected Utility Theory, Catastrophic Risks
JEL Classification: Q54
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Justifying Social Discounting: The Rank-Discounted Utilitarian Approach
By Stephane Zuber and Geir B. Asheim
-
The Malleability of Undiscounted Utilitarianism as a Criterion of Intergenerational Justice
By Geir B. Asheim and Wolfgang Buchholz
-
Discounting and Welfare Analysis Over Time: Choosing the à3B7
By Wolfgang Buchholz and Jan Schumacher
-
New Frontiers in the Economics of Climate Change
By Simon Dietz and David J. Maddison
-
Expected Utility and Catastrophic Risk
By Masako Ikefuji, Roger J. A. Laeven, ...
-
Intertemporal Evaluation Criteria for Climate Change Policy: The Basic Ethical Issues
-
Strong Anonymity and Infinite Streams
By Luc Lauwers