Prosperous Pacifists: The Effects of Development on Initiators and Targets of Territorial Conflict
Institute for Empirical Research in Economics University of Zurich Working Paper No. 500
38 Pages Posted: 16 Sep 2010
Date Written: September 1, 2010
Abstract
Scholars have suggested several ways in which economic development could affect interstate conflict. Supply side arguments view modern economies as more difficult to subdue or exploit through force (i.e., development creates states that are 'bitter pills'). The demand side perspective argues in contrast that development lessens the appeal of conquest among potential aggressors (i.e., development creates 'prosperous pacifists'). We offer a formal model that isolates contrasting consequences of development for initiators and targets. We use a directed dyad research design to test hypotheses drawn from the model on measures of territorial conflict. The development of potential initiators, not of possible targets, discourages conflict among nations.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Greed and Grievance in Civil War
By Paul Collier and Anke Hoeffler
-
By Paul Collier, Anke Hoeffler, ...
-
Causes and Consequences of Civil Strife: Micro-Level Evidence from Uganda
-
Ethnic Partition as a Solution to Ethnic War: An Empirical Critique of the Theoretical Literature
-
Poverty, Social Divisions, and Conflict in Nepal
By Lakshmi Iyer and Quy-toan Do
-
Local Conflict in Indonesia: Measuring Incidence and Identifying Patterns
By Patrick Barron, Kai Kaiser, ...
-
Reappraising the Greed and Grievance Explanations for Violent Internal Conflict
-
Military Expenditure: Threats, Aid, and Arms Races
By Paul Collier and Anke Hoeffler