Lay Theories and the Cultural Contingency of Happiness
14 Pages Posted: 15 Oct 2010
Date Written: October 14, 2010
Abstract
This paper plans to explore the extent to which prevailing lay understandings of happiness are culturally contingent. It addresses the case of home, EU and international students in British Universities. The proposed research seeks to investigate a number of academic issues, such as the cultural relativity of happiness, the norms and values that people from different cultures attribute to subjective well-being in a multicultural society and the variation of hedonic and eudaemonic understandings of happiness among these people. The conclusions drawn from the data analysis found differences in lay understandings of happiness, in part co-related to the following culturally contingent tendencies: notions of the independent vs. interdependent self; individually vs. socially oriented; individualism vs. collectivism; and personal accomplishment and self-esteem vs. social harmony and connectedness.
Keywords: Happiness, Subjective Well-Being, Lay Theories, Cross-Cultural Investigations, Individualism/Collectivism
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
By Ed Diener
-
What Can Economists Learn from Happiness Research?
By Bruno S. Frey and Alois Stutzer
-
Culture and Subjective Well-Being
By William Tov and Ed Diener
-
A Note on Unhappiness and Unemployment Duration
By Andrew Clark
-
Happiness, Economy and Institutions
By Bruno S. Frey and Alois Stutzer
-
Subjective Well-Being: Three Decades of Progress
By Ed Diener, Eunkook Suh, ...
-
Inequality and Happiness: Are Europeans and Americans Different?
By Alberto F. Alesina, Rafael Di Tella, ...