Embedding Culture and Finance: Divorce or a Fresh Start?

21 Pages Posted: 31 Oct 2010

See all articles by Charles H. J. Reuter

Charles H. J. Reuter

University of Lorraine - CEREFIGE Research Center; Labex-Refi

Date Written: January 30, 2010

Abstract

We provide a perspective on the contradiction provided by a rising culture-interest, and, the lack of a successful culture-paradigm in financial research. We emphasize how "culture-research" and financial research rest on strikingly different epistemological roots. Culture is concerned with conditionality, conceptuality, ends (values), qualitative evidence, limited diversity, fades, and it is guided by understanding. Culture largely evades precise definition and measurement. Finance is established on deductive and instrumental rationality, on modeling, on measurement, on a-temporality, on an appeal for marginal analysis and it is oriented by quantitative prediction. To overcome this tension we propose a conceptual tool to think about culture in financial research. Chiefly we distinguish between the types of actors being involved in financial phenomena and their expected behavioral and cognitive homogeneity. Then we recommend defining culture 'backward', from primo the mechanism relating it to the financial outcome, and segundo the homogeneity within the group regarding that mechanism.

This conceptual framework can be of use to culture-scholars across disciplines. In management, it exemplifies how the view of culture as "toolkits", "layers" and "repertoires" can be intellectually powerful and empirically fruitful within a specific field of inquiry (finance). In finance, we contribute to the understanding of the tensions around "culture-research", and, outlining the epistemological roots to that tension, we exemplify one path that a re-foundation (Zingales, 2000) could engage into. Overall, we provide a grid to understand, and partly reconcile, the complementary foundations of culture research about financial issues within finance, or in sociology, economics, psychology... Eventually we reflect on how the culture-approach, unlike Behavioral Finance, can be compatible with a view of Finance as primarily, conditionally and deductively rational. In a way reminiscent of Simon (1945/1976) suggesting that complexity in Organizations brings limits to rationality, we suggest, here, that culture brings conditionality and temporality to the scientific analysis and quantitative modeling of financial phenomena (culture understood here as the grip exerted by collectives on individual cognitions, behaviors & the rules structuring their interactions).

Keywords: Finance, Culture, National Culture, Institutional Context, Law and Finance, Epistemology

Suggested Citation

Reuter, Charles H. J., Embedding Culture and Finance: Divorce or a Fresh Start? (January 30, 2010). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1700253 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1700253

Charles H. J. Reuter (Contact Author)

University of Lorraine - CEREFIGE Research Center ( email )

13 rue Michel Ney
Nancy, 54000
France

Labex-Refi ( email )

79 Avenue de la République
Paris, 75011
France

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
206
Abstract Views
1,354
Rank
267,444
PlumX Metrics