Verifying Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Annex I Parties: Methods We Have and Methods We Want

Climate Law, Vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 409-427, 2010

18 Pages Posted: 8 Nov 2010 Last revised: 7 Feb 2011

See all articles by Alexander Zahar

Alexander Zahar

Southwest University of Political Science and Law; China-ASEAN Legal Research Center; Macquarie University - Macquarie Law School (Sydney, Australia)

Date Written: November 7, 2010

Abstract

Despite the hopeful prediction in the New York Times story (quoted at the head of the article), we are very far from being able to use satellites to verify compliance with the Kyoto Protocol’s caps on greenhouse gas emissions. The problem is not only one of insufficiently developed or installed technology of Annex I states. “Satellite verification” would also mean changing the current system of reporting-and-review of state emissions, opening it up to independent scrutiny, and making it less forgiving of state evasiveness and ambiguity about emissions than it is now. Some states will be interested in this proposal and others will not. In any event, the current MRV system, built on bottom-up state reporting, will remain the dominant framework of international GHG emissions knowledge for the foreseeable future. To safeguard its own credibility, it must progressively be strengthened. In this article I outline the existing verification regime’s main shortcomings and argue that the most efficient way around them is to incorporate into the current MRV system top-down (satellite and surface) measurements, resolved by modeling software at the state level, and produced by independent scientific experts in cooperation with the UNFCCC.

Keywords: UNFCCC, Kyoto Protocol, greenhouse gases, MRV, verification, Expert Review Teams, satellite measurement of atmospheric CO2

Suggested Citation

Zahar, Alexander, Verifying Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Annex I Parties: Methods We Have and Methods We Want (November 7, 2010). Climate Law, Vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 409-427, 2010, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1704882

Alexander Zahar (Contact Author)

Southwest University of Political Science and Law ( email )

Chongqing
China

China-ASEAN Legal Research Center ( email )

Chongqing, Chongqing
China

Macquarie University - Macquarie Law School (Sydney, Australia) ( email )

North Ryde
Sydney, New South Wales 2109
Australia

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
94
Abstract Views
499
Rank
499,092
PlumX Metrics