Democracy and Innovation
Institute for Empirical Research in Economics, University of Zurich, Working Paper No. 514
10 Pages Posted: 4 Dec 2010
Date Written: September 27, 2010
Abstract
Self-determination in politics has become the ideal everybody accepts. This paper argues that such contentment undermines the very idea of democracy. Democracy should be open to criticism and change. Two possible developments are considered: (a) More political power should be given to the citizens. Direct democracy is the appropriate form of democracy for the 21st century. (b) Many innovations are possible in democracy. The focus is on the potential role of random mechanisms to secure that the population is more fully represented in the political process both with respect to the persons in politics and the decisions taken.
JEL Classification: D7, D78, O31
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Relative Income, Happiness and Utility: An Explanation for the Easterlin Paradox and Other Puzzles
By Andrew Clark, Paul Frijters, ...
-
Does Marriage Make People Happy, or Do Happy People Get Married?
By Alois Stutzer and Bruno S. Frey
-
Does Happiness Adapt? A Longitudinal Study of Disability with Implications for Economists and Judges
-
Happiness Adaptation to Income and to Status in an Individual Panel
By Rafael Di Tella, John P. Haisken-denew, ...
-
Happiness Adaptation to Income and to Status in an Individual Panel
By Rafael Di Tella, John De New, ...
-
Does Wage Rank Affect Employees' Wellbeing?
By Gordon D. A. Brown, Jonathan Gardner, ...
-
Do Divorcing Couples Become Happier by Breaking Up?
By Jonathan Gardner and Andrew J. Oswald
-
Heterogeneity in Reported Well-Being: Evidence from Twelve European Countries
By Andrew Clark, Fabrice Etile, ...